Apolis

Deal: St. Louis Park West End, 200 unitsPage: Construction

Construction

Sample

Every deal being built: budget and contingency burn, completion slip, and the ratings.

Sample deals and sample budgets; no draw request or lender report is real.

Under construction
2
318 units
Revised budget
$86.6M
$820K over the original $85.8M
Spent
$41.0M
47.3% of the revised budget
Contingency left
$2.0M
1 burning ahead of the jobof $4.2M at the start

Is each job on budget and on time

Sample

Overall is the worst of the team's three ratings and the computed one.

  • Sample site: Cedar Lake flats
    Review
    Budget 61.9%Contingency 79.2%38 days late
  • Sample site: Hiawatha yards
    Watch
    Budget 27.1%Contingency 17.2%6 days late
How the ratings work

The developer, cost and schedule ratings are the team's own calls. The computed rating compares contingency used with budget used: fine while contingency is no more than 10 points ahead, watch up to 25 points ahead, review beyond that or once contingency is spent. Overall is the worst of the four.

Budget against spent

Original and revised budget, spent to date, and contingency, by deal.

Construction budget by deal: original, revised, change, spent, remaining, and contingency at the start and left
DealOriginal budgetRevisedChangeSpentRemainingContingency left
Sample site: Cedar Lake flats$49.6M$50.4M+$820K$31.2M (61.9%)$19.2M$500K of $2.4M
Sample site: Hiawatha yards$36.2M$36.2MNo change$9.8M (27.1%)$26.4M$1.5M of $1.8M