Same building, eight cities
City-controlled lines only; SAC and watershed lines are the same everywhere or set elsewhere.
City-controlled fees on the sample building ยท cheapest first
Hopkins
Golden Valley
Bloomington
St. Louis Park
Edina
Minneapolis
Minnetonka
Plymouth
- 1$565,000Sample
- 2$570,000Sample
- 3$595,000Sample
- 4$683,000Partly published
- 5$685,000Sample
- 6$965,000Sample
- 7$1,110,000Sample
- 8$1,375,000Sample
| Rank | City | City-controlled | Per unit | Published lines | Coverage | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hopkins | $565,000 | $2,825 | 0 of 4 | Sample | |
| 2 | Golden Valley | $570,000 | $2,850 | 0 of 5 | Sample | |
| 3 | Bloomington | $595,000 | $2,975 | 0 of 6 | Sample | |
| 4 | St. Louis Parkthe deal's city | $683,000 | $3,415 | 2 of 5 | Partly published | |
| 5 | Edina | $685,000 | $3,425 | 0 of 5 | Sample | |
| 6 | Minneapolis | $965,000 | $4,825 | 0 of 5 | Sample | |
| 7 | Minnetonka | $1,110,000 | $5,550 | 0 of 5 | Sample | |
| 8 | Plymouth | $1,375,000 | $6,875 | 0 of 6 | Sample |
Hopkins
5 fee lines, every line sample
| Fee | Provider | Basis | Amount | On this building | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAC (sewer availability charge) | Met Council | Per SAC unit | $2,485 per SAC unit | $397,600 | Published scheduleSource, 2026 base unit rate, retrieved 2026-11-07 |
| WAC (water availability charge) | City | Per unit | $600 per unit | $120,000 | Sample |
| Park dedication | City | Per unit | $1,200 per unit | $240,000 | Sample |
| Building permit | City | Valuation table | $175,000, a flat sample amount (no construction valuation applied) | $175,000 | Sample |
| Plan review | City | Flat | $30,000 flat | $30,000 | Sample |
Lines from Met Council are part of the stack but sit outside the city-controlled total, because the city does not set them.
Sample contacts
- Sample E. NovakPermit TechnicianSample contact, no outreach has occurred.
Golden Valley
6 fee lines, every line sample
| Fee | Provider | Basis | Amount | On this building | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAC (sewer availability charge) | Met Council | Per SAC unit | $2,485 per SAC unit | $397,600 | Published scheduleSource, 2026 base unit rate, retrieved 2026-11-07 |
| WAC (water availability charge) | City | Per unit | $850 per unit | $170,000 | Sample |
| Park dedication | City | Percent of land value | 6.00% of land value | $120,000 | Sample |
| Sewer connection | City | Per unit | $300 per unit | $60,000 | Sample |
| Building permit | City | Valuation table | $180,000, a flat sample amount (no construction valuation applied) | $180,000 | Sample |
| Plan review | City | Flat | $40,000 flat | $40,000 | Sample |
Lines from Met Council are part of the stack but sit outside the city-controlled total, because the city does not set them.
Sample contacts
- Sample M. LindqvistPlanning DirectorSample contact, no outreach has occurred.
Bloomington
7 fee lines, every line sample
| Fee | Provider | Basis | Amount | On this building | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAC (sewer availability charge) | Met Council | Per SAC unit | $2,485 per SAC unit | $397,600 | Published scheduleSource, 2026 base unit rate, retrieved 2026-11-07 |
| WAC (water availability charge) | City | Per unit | $800 per unit | $160,000 | Sample |
| Park dedication | City | Percent of land value | 5.00% of land value | $100,000 | Sample |
| Trunk area charge | City | Per acre | $12,000 per acre | $30,000 | Sample |
| Sewer connection | City | Per unit | $350 per unit | $70,000 | Sample |
| Building permit | City | Valuation table | $185,000, a flat sample amount (no construction valuation applied) | $185,000 | Sample |
| Plan review | City | Flat | $50,000 flat | $50,000 | Sample |
Lines from Met Council are part of the stack but sit outside the city-controlled total, because the city does not set them.
Sample contacts
- Sample A. ReyesPlanning DirectorSample contact, no outreach has occurred.
- Sample D. CarlsonUtility Billing SupervisorSample contact, no outreach has occurred.
St. Louis Park
6 fee lines, partly published: 2 of 5 lines from a published schedule, the rest sample
| Fee | Provider | Basis | Amount | On this building | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAC (sewer availability charge) | Met Council | Per SAC unit | $2,485 per SAC unit | $397,600 | Published scheduleSource, 2026 base unit rate, retrieved 2026-11-07 |
| WAC (water availability charge) | City | Per SAC unit | $800 per SAC unit | $128,000 | Published scheduleSource, 2026 fee schedule, effective January 1, 2026, retrieved 2026-11-07 |
| Park dedication | City | Per unit | $1,500 per unit | $300,000 | Published scheduleSource, 2026 fee schedule, effective January 1, 2026, retrieved 2026-11-07 |
| Trunk area charge | City | Per acre | $8,000 per acre | $20,000 | Sample |
| Building permit | City | Valuation table | $190,000, a flat sample amount (no construction valuation applied) | $190,000 | Sample |
| Plan review | City | Flat | $45,000 flat | $45,000 | Sample |
Lines from Met Council are part of the stack but sit outside the city-controlled total, because the city does not set them.
Sample contacts
- Sample T. VirtanenCommunity Development DirectorSample contact, no outreach has occurred.
Edina
6 fee lines, every line sample
| Fee | Provider | Basis | Amount | On this building | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAC (sewer availability charge) | Met Council | Per SAC unit | $2,485 per SAC unit | $397,600 | Published scheduleSource, 2026 base unit rate, retrieved 2026-11-07 |
| WAC (water availability charge) | City | Per unit | $900 per unit | $180,000 | Sample |
| Park dedication | City | Percent of land value | 8.00% of land value | $160,000 | Sample |
| Water connection | City | Per unit | $400 per unit | $80,000 | Sample |
| Building permit | City | Valuation table | $205,000, a flat sample amount (no construction valuation applied) | $205,000 | Sample |
| Plan review | City | Flat | $60,000 flat | $60,000 | Sample |
Lines from Met Council are part of the stack but sit outside the city-controlled total, because the city does not set them.
Sample contacts
- Sample L. BrandtBuilding OfficialSample contact, no outreach has occurred.
Minneapolis
6 fee lines, every line sample
| Fee | Provider | Basis | Amount | On this building | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAC (sewer availability charge) | Met Council | Per SAC unit | $2,485 per SAC unit | $397,600 | Published scheduleSource, 2026 base unit rate, retrieved 2026-11-07 |
| WAC (water availability charge) | City | Per unit | $650 per unit | $130,000 | Sample |
| Park dedication | City | Per unit | $2,500 per unit | $500,000 | Sample |
| Plan review | City | Valuation table | $95,000, a flat sample amount (no construction valuation applied) | $95,000 | Sample |
| Building permit | City | Valuation table | $210,000, a flat sample amount (no construction valuation applied) | $210,000 | Sample |
| Sewer connection | City | Flat | $30,000 flat | $30,000 | Sample |
Lines from Met Council are part of the stack but sit outside the city-controlled total, because the city does not set them.
Sample contacts
- Sample R. OkaforPlanning DirectorSample contact, no outreach has occurred.
- Sample J. PhamUtility Billing SupervisorSample contact, no outreach has occurred.
Minnetonka
7 fee lines, every line sample
| Fee | Provider | Basis | Amount | On this building | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAC (sewer availability charge) | Met Council | Per SAC unit | $2,485 per SAC unit | $397,600 | Published scheduleSource, 2026 base unit rate, retrieved 2026-11-07 |
| WAC (water availability charge) | City | Per unit | $1,100 per unit | $220,000 | Sample |
| Park dedication | City | Per unit | $3,000 per unit | $600,000 | Sample |
| Trunk area charge | City | Per acre | $14,000 per acre | $35,000 | Sample |
| Building permit | City | Valuation table | $200,000, a flat sample amount (no construction valuation applied) | $200,000 | Sample |
| Plan review | City | Flat | $55,000 flat | $55,000 | Sample |
| Stormwater management | Watershed district | Per acre | $6,000 per acre | $15,000 | Sample |
Lines from Met Council and the watershed district are part of the stack but sit outside the city-controlled total, because the city does not set them.
Sample contacts
- Sample K. HalvorsenPark Planning ManagerSample contact, no outreach has occurred.
- Sample S. MehtaCity EngineerSample contact, no outreach has occurred.
Plymouth
8 fee lines, every line sample
| Fee | Provider | Basis | Amount | On this building | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAC (sewer availability charge) | Met Council | Per SAC unit | $2,485 per SAC unit | $397,600 | Published scheduleSource, 2026 base unit rate, retrieved 2026-11-07 |
| WAC (water availability charge) | City | Per unit | $1,000 per unit | $200,000 | Sample |
| Park dedication | City | Per unit | $4,000 per unit | $800,000 | Sample |
| Trunk area charge | City | Per acre | $16,000 per acre | $40,000 | Sample |
| Water connection | City | Per unit | $450 per unit | $90,000 | Sample |
| Building permit | City | Valuation table | $195,000, a flat sample amount (no construction valuation applied) | $195,000 | Sample |
| Plan review | City | Flat | $50,000 flat | $50,000 | Sample |
| Stormwater management | Watershed district | Per acre | $7,000 per acre | $17,500 | Sample |
Lines from Met Council and the watershed district are part of the stack but sit outside the city-controlled total, because the city does not set them.
Sample contacts
- Sample H. DuboisCity EngineerSample contact, no outreach has occurred.
- Sample P. AnandPark Planning ManagerSample contact, no outreach has occurred.
Method and sample assumptions
SAC is excluded from the ranking because Met Council's one regional rate is identical in all eight ($2,485 per SAC unit, the published 2026 base unit rate; $397,600 on this building at the sample determination, in every city), and watershed lines are excluded because the district sets them, not the city.
On the same sample 200-unit building, Hopkins carries the cheapest city-controlled stack at $565,000 ($2,825 per unit) and Plymouth the most expensive at $1,375,000 ($6,875 per unit), a spread of $810,000. No city's total is fully published: every bar rests in whole or in part on sample lines.
Sample assumptions, each a named constant: per-acre lines price a 2.5-acre sample site; percent-of-land lines apply to the sample deal's own land line of $2,000,000; the SAC determination counts 160 SAC units, the unit count times 0.8, rounded. 0.8 SAC units per apartment is a sample assumption; the Met Council SAC procedure manual sets the actual determination. Valuation-table rows are flat sample amounts; no construction valuation is applied to them.
The worked example's uses table carries $1,600,000 for City and government. Its own city, St. Louis Park, comes to $683,000 city-controlled plus $397,600 SAC, $1,080,600 in all; the remaining $519,400 is unallocated in the sample (the budget line is a sample allowance, not built from these rows).
How a row gets verified (41 sample, 10 published schedule, 0 city confirmed)
1Sample41
A structurally realistic placeholder. Never a claim about a real city.
2Published schedule10
The figure is copied from the provider's official published schedule, with the source link, the date it was read and the schedule year. Not yet confirmed with the city.
3City confirmed0
The named desk confirmed figure and method in writing for this project's specifics.
10 of 51 rows carry a published schedule, 41 are sample, and 0 are city confirmed. Published rows cite their source and retrieval date and are not yet confirmed with any city.
Outreach to a city is drafted inside Apolis and shown to a human before anything is sent to a real desk; nothing on this page contacts a city on its own. When a row climbs a rung it is replaced with a sourced one, the counts recount on their own, and the page never says more than its rows can prove.
These stacks live inside the permitting phase of the two clocks on the pipeline board, where permit and utility connection fees are a named task with an owner.